Where the costumes are a cast member – Keats & Fanny Brawne as fiction in ‘Bright Star’

In December I wrote a blog post entitled Picturing John Keats –  Image or Imagination? describing how I felt about the representations of Keats in art. I mentioned the 2009 film Bright Star only briefly as but another opportunity for the real Keats to become distorted in our minds (this time by the lovely Ben Whishaw).

However, following a twitter conversation with historian Emma Jolly, who spent an evening watching the film with her son; it occurred to me that the film has a very striking effect in another way. The rules governing what young women should wear in these years of the Regency period (it is set in 1818-1821) seem to drive the film and the costumes become an important member of the cast in a way that is not always so apparent in other period dramas.

This is perhaps because the costume designer Janet Patterson was actually designing for a lead character – the love of Keats’ life, Fanny Brawne – who in the film at least is a student of fashion who makes her own clothes.

It is clear in the film that Fanny’s skill is belittled by the male characters and is not perceived as an art in itself, which it most certainly is if we are to believe she had indeed created the costumes herself, by hand in her bedroom. At just eighteen her talent would have been extraordinary, and some of the early fabric choices are to my untrained eye quite unorthodox for the period, chosen for striking visual effect rather than for authenticity.

Director Jane Campion also makes it clear that as a seamstress Fanny was not perceived by his friends as a sufficiently intelligent a match for Keats, which from surviving correspondence is close to the truth.

Fanny in 1833

Silhouette of Fanny Brawne

As anyone who has read this blog before will know, I love the film and can immerse myself in it as a piece of cinema. I am careful though to keep in my mind the knowledge that this is not John Keats and Fanny Brawne, however beautifully the parts are played. We have little idea of the clothes Fanny wore at eighteen and in the few images we have of her she is not dressed like Ms Cornish. We also have a very one-sided view of the love-affair as only Keats’ letters survive; the contents of some meant that for many years Fanny was vilified as a flighty piece unworthy of his affections, even though she had treasured every note, keeping them secret all her life.

Is  this really another example of how easily we can be influenced by the media? For many Ben Whishaw and Abbie Cornish will be Keats and Fanny, in the way that Colin Firth has to a new generation become King George VI. My mother didn’t enjoy the film The King’s Speech much at all – she thought Firth was nothing like the ‘real thing’, even though that really wasn’t the point.

 

Janet Patterson was Oscar nominated for the costume design on Bright Star, and is renowned for the way she works hard to ‘live’ the era she is working to. She also designed for ‘The Piano’ and ‘Portrait of a Lady’. I do have to say I love the designs for Keats’ clothes, his coat particularly. My daughter wants one just like it. But where the ‘real’ Keats was described as physically short, but robust and full of energy, Whishaw’s portrayal is frail, pale and very quietly done. John Keats was known to dress, quote, ‘a la Byron’, but the costumes for Whishaw are muted and undeniably down-at-heel. He looks wonderful, but his portrayal is of the sort of ‘Romantic’ Keats we might expect to see on screen, rather than an attempt at truth.

I have read discussions about the costumes, and there is a view that they evolve through the film to tell their own story. Bright and vibrant at the start, as the situation changes, becomes desperate towards the end and eventually ends in tragedy the clothes become paler, less brash, more washed out so that the ‘widow’s weeds’ Fanny dons at the end of the film become all the more striking.

 

Abbie Cornish was quoted as saying of the outfits designed for her:

“The things I loved the most were the jackets, shoes and hats. They were so authentic it was kind of scary. I had undergarments, stockings, the corset, a petticoat, then another layer which give the dress its shape, and another layer over that with a blouse, and then the dress, then the collar… sometimes I had six layers of clothing on my body.”

The film oozes attention to Regency period detail. It is atmospheric and beautifully photographed and you can just let it flutter past you like the butterflies Fanny and her sister capture in glass jars. But the star of the film should always be Keats and his poetry and even though Jane Campion was clear the film was from Fanny Brawne’s perspective in that sense it is very much a fiction.

About these ads
This entry was posted in History, Keats, Poetry and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Where the costumes are a cast member – Keats & Fanny Brawne as fiction in ‘Bright Star’

  1. Elizabeth says:

    First of all, let me confess that I haven’t seen “Bright Star” but I do agree with you that when watching films based on real people/events, we must keep the distinction between historical fact and artistic creations quite separate. When people complain that so-and-so in a film is nothing like the real person he portrays, I always retort: well, he’s not supposed to be – we’re watching a work of fiction, not a documentary. Today’s period pieces seem so realistic (with authentic costumes, furniture, etc.) it’s easy to forget this difference.

    • keatsbabe says:

      I really do recommend the film, it is wonderful and so easy to lose oneself in. It is so important not to to muddle fiction with fact however – Ben Whishaw may be wonderful but there is so much in Keats’ writing to offer a real sense of him as a person that I hope people take time to find out more.

  2. Emma Jolly says:

    Very thought-provoking, Suzie. The costumes were very beautiful, but rather clean, particularly those of children playing outside and those dying of tuberculosis. None were worn or patched in the way they surely would have been. The details, however, were impressive.

    I watched the ITV production of ‘The Suspicions of Mr Whicher’ last night and thought the attention to detail with the costumes and hairstyles was very good. The mention of a piece of fabric ‘women wear between their bosom and their corset’ was just one detail used to capture the period; the linen nightgown another.

    • keatsbabe says:

      Yes – I really enjoyed The Suspicions of Mr Whicher. Big Paddy Consadine fan anyway and I agree with you – they really seemed to capture the period. It also worked well with the fact/fiction divide.

  3. “Bright Star” is one of my favorite movies, not least because I live near Keats’ House and visit it often. For a short time a few of the costumes were on display. It was very hard to keep my hands off of them! They were very vibrant and exquisitely made. I was astonished to see how small the sizing was for both Fanny and Keats. I enjoyed your post.

    • keatsbabe says:

      I am so envious of you being so close – I used to live just up the Northern Line but Somerset is too far to enjoy the regular trips to the house I made, well before the recent refurb. Bright Star has become one of my all-time favourite films too – it has a quiet intensity that I love. Glad you enjoyed the post – I enjoyed writing it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s